![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
PENNSYLVANIA
5th Series April 30, 2008 IN THIS ISSUE An untimely Rule 1925 statement filed under the new version of that rule waives the matters complained of just as it was under the earlier version. Furthermore, the only time a criminal court can transfer a homicide case to juvenile court is when the child demonstrates, by a preponderance of the evidence, that transfer to the juvenile court will serve the public interest. The court recommended affirmance of its judgments of sentence for the two defendants. Commonwealth v. McEneaney, 2 D.&C.5th 449 (Delaware County, December 27, 2007) Jenkins. J. Defendant did not prove that his guilty plea and sentence were the result of manifest injustice where he claimed he did not knowingly and voluntarily give up his right to confront his accuser at trial. Affirmance recommended. Commonwealth v. McCoy, 2 D.&C.5th 478 (Delaware County, January 15, 2008) Jenkins, J. |
|
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
Copyright © 2008, Jenkins Law Library/American Lawyer Media. All rights reserved.
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us |
![]() |